File Name: routledge philosophy guidebook to kripke and naming and necessity .zip
David Hume was one of the most important British philosophers of the eighteenth century. The first part of his Treatise on Human Nature is a seminal work in philosophy. He is the author of Hume on Knowledge , and Personal Identity second edition , both available from Routledge.
As such it presents particular challenges for theories of meaning , and it has become a central problem in analytic philosophy.
The common-sense view was originally formulated by John Stuart Mill in A System of Logic , where he defines it as "a word that answers the purpose of showing what thing it is that we are talking about but not of telling anything about it". Gottlob Frege pointed out that proper names may apply to imaginary and [ ambiguous ] nonexistent entities, without becoming meaningless, and he showed that sometimes more than one proper name may identify the same entity without having the same sense , so that the phrase "Homer believed the morning star was the evening star" could be meaningful and not tautological in spite of the fact that the morning star and the evening star identifies the same referent.
This example became known as Frege's puzzle and is a central issue in the theory of proper names. Bertrand Russell was the first to propose a descriptivist theory of names , which held that a proper name refers not to a referent, but to a set of true propositions that uniquely describe a referent — for example, "Aristotle" refers to "the teacher of Alexander the Great".
Rejecting descriptivism, Saul Kripke and Keith Donnellan instead advanced causal-historical theories of reference , which hold that names come to be associated with individual referents because social groups who link the name to its reference in a naming event e. Today [ vague ] a direct reference theory is common, which holds that proper names refer to their referents without attributing any additional information, connotative or of sense, about them.
The problems of proper names arise within a theory of meaning that is based on truth values and propositional logic, when trying to ascertain the criteria with which to determine if propositions that include proper names are true or false. For example, in the proposition Cicero is Roman , it is unclear what semantic content the proper name Cicero provides to the proposition. One may intuitively assume that the name refers to a person who may or may not be Roman, and that the truth value depends on whether or not that is the case.
But from the point of view of a theory of meaning the question is how the word Cicero establishes its referent. Another problem, known as " Frege's puzzle ", asks why it can be the case that the two names can refer to the same referent, yet not necessarily be considered entirely synonymous. His example is that the proposition "Hesperus is Hesperus" Hesperus being the Greek name of the morning star is tautological and vacuous while the proposition "Hesperus is Phosphorus" Phosphorus being the Greek name of the evening star conveys information.
This puzzle suggests that there is something more to the meaning of the proper name than simply pointing out its referent. Many theories have been proposed about proper names, each attempting to solve the problems of reference and identity inherent in the concept.
John Stuart Mill distinguished between connotative and denotative meaning, and argued that proper names included no other semantic content to a proposition than identifying the referent of the name and were hence purely denotative. Gotlob Frege argued that one had to distinguish between the sense Sinn and the reference of the name, and that different names for the same entity might identify the same referent without being formally synonymous.
For example, although the morning star and the evening star are the same astronomical object, the proposition "the morning star is the evening star" is not a tautology , but provides actual information to someone who did not know this.
Hence, to Frege, the two names for the object must have a different sense. Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge , . The descriptive theory of proper names is the view that the meaning of a given use of a proper name is a set of properties that can be expressed as a description that picks out an object that satisfies the description.
Bertrand Russell espoused such a view arguing that the name refers to a description, and that description, like a definition, picks out the bearer of the name. The distinction between the embedded description and the bearer itself is similar to that between the extension and the intension Frege's terms of a general term, or between connotation and denotation Mill's terms.
John Searle elaborated Russell's theory, suggesting that the proper name refers to a cluster of propositions that in combination pick out a unique referent. This was meant to deal with the objection by some critics of Russell's theory that a descriptive theory of meaning would make the referent of a name dependent on the knowledge that the person saying the name has about the referent.
In , Tyler Burge proposed a metalinguistic descriptivist theory of proper names which holds that names have the meaning that corresponds to the description of the individual entities to whom the name is applied. This leads Burge to argue that plural usages of names, such as "all the Alfreds I know have red hair", support this view.
The causal-historical theory originated by Saul Kripke in Naming and Necessity ,  building on work by, among others, Keith Donnellan ,  combines the referential view with the idea that a name's referent is fixed by a baptismal act, whereupon the name becomes a rigid designator of the referent. Kripke did not emphasize causality, but rather the historical relation between the naming event and the community of speakers within which it circulates, but in spite of this the theory is often called "a causal theory of naming".
The pragmatic naming theory of Charles Sanders Peirce is sometimes considered a precursor of causal-historical naming theory.
He described proper names in the following terms: "A proper name, when one meets with it for the first time, is existentially connected with some percept or other equivalent individual knowledge of the individual it names. It is then, and then only, a genuine Index. The next time one meets with it, one regards it as an Icon of that Index. The habitual acquaintance with it having been acquired, it becomes a Symbol whose Interpretant represents it as an Icon of an Index of the Individual named.
Rejecting sense-based, descriptivist and causal-historical theories of naming, theories of direct reference hold that names together with demonstratives are a class of words that refer directly to their referent. In the Tractatus Logico Philosophicus Ludwig Wittgenstein also held a direct reference position, arguing that names refer to a particular directly, and that this referent is its only meaning. Direct reference theory is similar to Mill's theory in that it proposes that the only meaning of a proper name is its referent.
Modern proposals such as those by David Kaplan , which distinguish between Fregean and non-Fregean terms, the former which have both sense and reference and the latter which include proper names and have only reference.
Outside of the analytic tradition few continental philosophers have approached the proper name as a philosophical problem.
In Of Grammatology Jacques Derrida specifically refutes the idea that proper names stand outside of the social construct of language as a binary relation between referent and sign. Rather he argues, the proper name as all words are caught up in a context of social, spatial and temporal differences that make it meaningful.
He also notes that there are subjective elements of meaning in proper names, since they connect the bearer of a name with the sign of their own identity. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Main article: Descriptivist theory of names. Main article: Causal theory of reference. Main article: Direct reference theory.
London: J. The end of Millianism: multiple bearers, improper names, and compositional meaning. The Journal of philosophy, A strictly Millian approach to the definition of the proper name. On Sense and Reference. Geach, M. Black, eds.
Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell. Mind, 86, The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Entry "Proper name". Mind, 67 , Reference and proper names. The Journal of Philosophy, Naming and Necessity. Basil Blackwell. Proper names and identifying descriptions. Synthese, 21 , The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp.
Peirce on Proper Names. Psychology, 1, A Companion to the Philosophy of Language p. The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language. Wittgenstein on Names. Essays in Philosophy, 1 2 , 7. Wittgenstein on proper names or: Under the circumstances. Philosophical Studies, 39 1 , Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction.
Routledge, pp. Categories : Names Philosophy of language. Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing clarification from September All Wikipedia articles needing clarification. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file.
Download as PDF Printable version. Bahasa Indonesia Edit links.
The New Theory of Reference pp Cite as. This paper aims to accomplish two interdependent goals, one historical and one philosophical. First, I aim to present a partial history of the theories of direct, causal or rigid reference as they appear in the New Theory of Reference, an account additional to that presented in [Smith, a, b]. Second, I aim to critically assess and further develop these theories. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Skip to main content.
Naming and Necessity is a book with the transcript of three lectures, given by the philosopher Saul Kripke , at Princeton University in , in which he dealt with the debates of proper names in the philosophy of language. Language is a primary concern of analytic philosophers , particularly the use of language to express concepts and to refer to individuals. In Naming and Necessity , Kripke considers several questions that are important within analytic philosophy:.
The traditional descriptivist distinction between the sense and reference of a proper name came under attack in the twentieth century. Kripke and Putnam attack the idea that the sense of a name determines its reference and serves as a mode of presentation for its reference.
I still stop breathing every time I think of it. They conceived of a grand opera that would reach out to an audience of unprecedented scale. A spectacle that everyone would love, written in popular style. By the morning we could be seriously rich. There was so much neon the street lighting was superfluous.
More search options. We are sorting your search results to highlight Open Access and other online resources. Some publishers are giving free access to online materials during the corona virus outbreak — find and access many of these resources through Discover. Read more on our blog Open Access Resources. Results 1 - 2 of 2.
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year. Duplicate citations. The following articles are merged in Scholar.
As such it presents particular challenges for theories of meaning , and it has become a central problem in analytic philosophy. The common-sense view was originally formulated by John Stuart Mill in A System of Logic , where he defines it as "a word that answers the purpose of showing what thing it is that we are talking about but not of telling anything about it". Gottlob Frege pointed out that proper names may apply to imaginary and [ ambiguous ] nonexistent entities, without becoming meaningless, and he showed that sometimes more than one proper name may identify the same entity without having the same sense , so that the phrase "Homer believed the morning star was the evening star" could be meaningful and not tautological in spite of the fact that the morning star and the evening star identifies the same referent. This example became known as Frege's puzzle and is a central issue in the theory of proper names. Bertrand Russell was the first to propose a descriptivist theory of names , which held that a proper name refers not to a referent, but to a set of true propositions that uniquely describe a referent — for example, "Aristotle" refers to "the teacher of Alexander the Great". Rejecting descriptivism, Saul Kripke and Keith Donnellan instead advanced causal-historical theories of reference , which hold that names come to be associated with individual referents because social groups who link the name to its reference in a naming event e.
Invited to survey my work in Philosophy of Education related to the later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, I first investigate how Wittgenstein became a significant thinker in this field. One case is rule-deviation within curriculum reforms, where instead of standardization and consensus we find multiple interpretations of curricular rules. Another vexing question is how we judge with some degree of certainty the efficacy or sanity of various pedagogical practices, as in weighing the merits of discovery versus fundamentals approaches in math training. I should not like my writing to spare other people the trouble of thinking. But, if possible, to stimulate someone to thoughts of his own. PI, p. Compared to some of your other contributors, like Michael A.
Коммандер спас ей жизнь. Стоя в темноте, она испытывала чувство огромного облегчения, смешанного, конечно же, с ощущением вины: агенты безопасности приближаются.
Но это была чужая епархия. В конце концов ей пришлось смириться. Когда они в ту ночь отправились спать, она старалась радоваться с ним вместе, но что-то в глубине души говорило ей: все это кончится плохо. Она оказалась права, но никогда не подозревала насколько. - Вы заплатили ему десять тысяч долларов? - Она повысила голос.
Saul Kripke is one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. His most celebrated work, Naming and Necessity, makes arguably the most.Beltane D. 07.05.2021 at 14:09
Necessity-Harold Noonan Saul Kripke is one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. His most celebrated work.Jared S. 10.05.2021 at 04:34
Sony xperia mini pro pdf the effects of the cognitive interview and other methods of context reinstatement on identification pdfRobert A. 10.05.2021 at 16:15
Navigationsleiste aufklappen.Ceferino C. 12.05.2021 at 00:47
A rigid designator designates the same object in all possible worlds in which that object exists and never designates anything else.