deontological and teleological theories of ethics pdf Sunday, May 9, 2021 12:21:33 AM

Deontological And Teleological Theories Of Ethics Pdf

File Name: deontological and teleological theories of ethics .zip
Size: 16842Kb
Published: 09.05.2021

In this terminology , action is more important than the consequences.

It is concerned with the articulation and the justification of the fundamental principles that govern the issues of how we should live and what we morally ought to do. Its most general concerns are providing an account of moral evaluation and, possibly, articulating a decision procedure to guide moral action. Though both these aims rely on articulating the correct set of moral principles that govern evaluation and that can also be used in articulating a decision procedure or rule, they are not coextensive. Recent critical work, especially on the part of particularists and virtue ethicists, has generated more pressure to separate clearly the two. Keywords: normative ethics , moral evaluation , moral action , decision procedure , moral principles , virtue ethics.

General Theories of Ethics

Two strands of thought exist in ethics regarding decision-making: deontological and utilitarian. In brief, deontology is patient-centered, whereas utilitarianism is society-centered. Although these approaches contradict each other, each of them has their own substantiating advantages and disadvantages in medical practice. Over years, a trend has been observed from deontological practice to utilitarian approach leading to frustration and discontentment. Health care system and practitioners need to balance both these ethical arms to bring congruity in medical practice. Ethics is a crucial branch in medicine guiding good medical practice. They are based on four fundamental principles, i.

Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine

This chapter discusses three competing approaches to ethical analysis: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. It describes the Integrity Approach that combines consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics. The chapter concludes by discussing the case IHC Caland to illustrate the inadequacy of applying general ethical theories to the corporate domain. The three competing approaches to ethical analysis are consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. We conclude this discussion with an exposition of the Integrity Approach that integrates consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics. According to consequentialist ethics, the moral content of an action is determined by the real and expected consequences of that action. An action is morally good if its consequences are desirable and bad if they are not.

Consequentialist vs. There are two broad categories of ethical theories concerning the source of value: consequentialist and non-consequentialist. A consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on the consequences that action has. A non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its consequences. Libertarianism--People should be free to do as they like as long as they respect the freedom of others to do the same.

Deontological ethics , in philosophy , ethical theories that place special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions. In deontological ethics an action is considered morally good because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the product of the action is good. Deontological ethics holds that at least some acts are morally obligatory regardless of their consequences for human welfare. By contrast, teleological ethics also called consequentialist ethics or consequentialism holds that the basic standard of morality is precisely the value of what an action brings into being. Deontological theories have been termed formalistic, because their central principle lies in the conformity of an action to some rule or law.

Deontological ethics

The word deontology derives from the Greek words for duty deon and science or study of logos. In contemporary moral philosophy, deontology is one of those kinds of normative theories regarding which choices are morally required, forbidden, or permitted. In other words, deontology falls within the domain of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do deontic theories , in contrast to those that guide and assess what kind of person we are and should be aretaic [virtue] theories. And within the domain of moral theories that assess our choices, deontologists—those who subscribe to deontological theories of morality—stand in opposition to consequentialists. Because deontological theories are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological theories themselves.

Reamer, PhD June In the late s several colleagues and I began our deep dive into the subject of social work ethics. This was an exciting time rich with possibility. The broad field of professional ethics was in its infancy, relatively speaking, having emerged from the centuries-old classic discipline of moral philosophy. The field of medicine led the way, in part because of the growing recognition of the profoundly complex ethical dilemmas health care professionals face related to life and death and the quality of life.

One factor we can use to better understand how to apply an ethical theory is to determine whether it is deontological or teleological. Deontological ethics systems rely on our sense of duty to act according to what is right. Therefore, they are very much focussed on whether an action is morally right in and of itself, rather than looking to the consequences, intentions or motives of an action.

Teleological ethics

Modern ethics, especially since the 18th-century German deontological philosophy of Immanuel Kant , has been deeply divided between a form of teleological ethics utilitarianism and deontological theories. Teleological theories differ on the nature of the end that actions ought to promote. Utilitarian -type theories hold that the end consists in an experience or feeling produced by the action.

What is the difference between deontological and teleological ethics systems?

В дверях стояла Росио Ева Гранада. Это было впечатляющее зрелище. Длинные ниспадающие рыжие волосы, идеальная иберийская кожа, темно-карие глаза, высокий ровный лоб. На девушке был такой же, как на немце, белый махровый халат с поясом, свободно лежащим на ее широких бедрах, распахнутый ворот открывал загорелую ложбинку между грудями. Росио уверенно, по-хозяйски вошла в спальню.

 Пока ничего, сэр. Кажется, придется повозиться дольше, чем ожидалось, - это был звонок с мобильника. С мобильника, - мысленно повторил Нуматака.


This article examines the most prominent ethical theories from the view point of economic rationality. Authors argue that utilitarian perspective which used to be.


Да я бы ничего и не взял у умирающего. О небо. Только подумайте.

2 Comments

Summer G. 10.05.2021 at 12:43

area of ethics to grasp and understand some of the basic foundations of Teleological & Deontological Ethics. Keywords:Ethics, Moral Philosophy.

Odette D. 13.05.2021 at 21:21

PDF | This article examines the most prominent ethical theories from the view point of economic rationality. Authors argue that utilitarian.

LEAVE A COMMENT